20 Reasons Why You Should Be Working With A Tax Accountant

We value the loyal, long-standing clients that we have had the pleasure of working with for many years. Kevin Malick of Appreciated Advertising is one of those clients, and he recently shared some thoughts on his experience of working with us for nearly a decade.

“I have been working with the professionals at The Bookkeeping Company since 2007. As a small business owner, I don’t have time to do everything and I never have to worry about my payroll and finances. Knowing that the professionals at The Bookkeeping Company are taking care of everything for me gives me great peace of mind.

When my father passed away, I took over the family business and I sought an accountant and a bookkeeper. As a member of OEA (Omaha Executives Association), I knew Bob and trusted his expertise. I thought Berger & O’Toole and The Bookkeeping Company would be a good fit for my business, and they have been ever since. They now manage my personal finances as well.

The entire staff at The Bookkeeping Company is always friendly and courteous. I used to dread tax time and tax preparation, but their staff takes care of everything for me and they have taken the worry out the process for me.”

It is our pleasure to work with Kevin, and the many clients that we have been working with for many years. Give us a call today to learn more about how the experienced accountants at Berger & O’Toole and the professionals at The Bookkeeping Company can help take the worry out of your taxes and finances.

Close

Working for home can have many benefits, and while it may not be for everyone, many employees prefer a home office over a commute to a traditional office. According to Global Workplace Analytics, regular work-at-home employment among the non-self-employed population has increased 100% since 2005.

A recent study conducted by the organization, one of the foremost authorities on how, when and where people are working, found that 50% of the US workforce holds a job that is compatible with at least partial telecommute, and as much as 25% of the population works from home with regularity. The study found that 80-90% of the US workforce would like to telecommute at least part-time.

The benefits of telecommuting extend beyond convenience and lack of a commute – there can be significant tax benefits for employees. Understanding if you qualify for a home office deduction is critical, and our experienced staff can help.

Here are some considerations to keep in mind:

• You must use your home for business use on a regular basis and as your principal place of business
• You must use part of your home exclusively for conducting business
• Your business use must be for the convenience of the employer, not the employee
• You must not rent any portion of your home to your employer or receive any reimbursements for the use of your home for business

If you qualify for the home office deduction, you can deduct prorated amounts for the following:

Home mortgage interest, or rent
• Utility bills
• Home repairs
• Depreciation

If you do not qualify for the home office deduction, you may still qualify for some business-related expenses. These expenses can fall into one of two categories:

• Business Expenses: business costs that are ordinary, necessary and reasonable, such as office supplies, postage, telephone line. You may also be allowed to depreciate the cost of computers, office furniture and possibly even the cost of the office itself
• Homeowners’ Deductions: expenses that are related to your home, such as home mortgage interest and real estate taxes, are allowed as itemized deductions regardless of your home office status

Taking advantage of available benefits is always advised, but the home office deduction is highly scrutinized by the IRS so understanding the rules and keeping meticulous records are essential. The experts with the Bookkeeping Company can help you manage your records on a regular basis in order to maximize eligible deductions. For example, if you conduct client meetings in your home you may qualify but the home office deduction, but meticulous records of dates and times of meetings, as well as understanding the minimum requirements, are important. Our bookkeepers can assist with the proper documentation.

As technological advances continue to improve, more companies are opting for a virtual environment. In many industries, employees can work from anywhere, and the need for a traditional brick and mortar building becomes less important. If you work virtually, or would like to consider it, let the experts in our office help you maximize the arrangement!

Close

One thing we hear all the time from small business owners is that they never expected all the paperwork! Budgets, payroll, tax forms – it can all be very overwhelming! The Bookkeeping Company can help you wade through all the paperwork, and determine if you need the help of a bookkeeper or if an accountant is what you need.

We help individuals and small business owners everyday who become overwhelmed with the papers and forms and deadlines. It’s not unusual for us to meet a client who thinks they need the help of an accountant, when in fact a bookkeeper is a better fit. So how do you know if you need a bookkeeper or an accountant? We can help!

If you struggle to keep up with invoices or the budget never seems to balance, a bookkeeper can help keep you on track and alleviate the worry. Here is a look at some of the areas a bookkeeper can help manage:

Bank and Budget reconciliation
Accounts payable and receivable
Payroll services, including year-end tax reporting
Quickbook Pro Advisor
Financial Statements
Sales and Use Tax Services

Our experienced staff can help with many other tasks, including notary public, contractor registration and new hire reporting. A full list of services offered by our qualified staff can be found here.

If you are comfortable with budgets and payroll, or have those covered by a qualified staff member, but you struggle with taxes, an accountant can assist you. Here’s a look at where an accountant can help:

Full accounting services
Audits, reviews and compilations
Financial forecasts and projections
Complete tax services
Tax planning and preparation

Give us a call, we are happy to help you determine if you need the help of a bookkeeper or an accountant – or both!

Close

According to Webster’s Dictionary, an entrepreneur is a person who starts a business and is willing to risk loss in order to make money. It is exciting to turn your dream and hard work into reality in the form of a successful business; but failing to take the proper steps to ensure your business is financially healthy can be disastrous.

When establishing your business, it is vital that you meet with an attorney to ensure your business is properly filed with state and federal entities and that your business is established with the proper state and federal IDs. Most business owners, who are experts in their own fields, are not experts in the rapidly- changing rules and regulations, so trusting those who are is crucial.

Business owners quickly learn the importance of proper record keeping. Missed deadlines or inaccurate tax or payroll filings can lead to penalties that are potentially insurmountable. Enlisting the help of The Bookkeeping Co. can give you the peace of mind that your company’s financial needs are being constantly monitored and maintained.

The Bookkeeping Co. will ensure your taxes are filed properly and on schedule, thereby avoiding any penalties for late or missed deadlines. We will not only help you balance and maintain your company’s budget, but we will help you understand the current and predicted future of your company’s financial situation. We will advise you accordingly, and ensure you understand the value and worth of your business.

Make an appointment with The Bookkeeping Co. today to learn more about how we can alleviate the worries associated with running a financially sound business, so you can focus on doing what you do best- running your business!

Close

It’s tax season, the time of year when we are reminded of how much paper we collect and save. Many financial institutions are moving towards electronic records, which is a good solution to help cut down on the growing piles of paper. But it’s important to save and file some of documents.

The IRS recommends maintaining tax returns and any supporting documents (W-2’s, income, deduction or credit documents, etc.) for at least seven years. This is the period of time you have to claim a refund that you are entitled to, or for the IRS to assess an additional tax if your reporting wasn’t accurate. Additional recommendations and details can be found on the IRS website.

The length of time you should hold on to other documents differs depending on the documents. Records of home improvement costs should be kept for as long as you own the home. Stock purchase documents showing the purchase price and date should be saved until you sell the investment. This can be extremely helpful if you decide to switch to a new stock broker.

Everyday documents such as credit card statements, utility bills, banks statements and paycheck stubs can be destroyed after a year. Hold on to quarterly investment statements until you receive the annual statement. Medical bills, cancelled insurance policies and records of real estate sales should be filed for three years. Records of satisfied loans should be kept for at least seven years.

When you do dispose of records that are no longer necessary, they should be shredded to protect your sensitive information. Many organizations also offer free document shredding events to assist with safe disposal of records.

There are some documents that should be kept forever – marriage licenses, birth certificates, wills, adoption papers, death certificates and records of paid mortgages. We recommend storing these records in a safe lock box or safety deposit box.

The paper collection can be overwhelming. The Bookkeeping Co. can help you manage that growing pile by answering your questions about what needs to be kept and what can be tossed. Give us a call today and we will help you simplify your record keeping.

Generally, you must keep your records that support an item of income, deduction or credit shown on your tax return until the period of limitations for that tax return runs out.

The period of limitations is the period of time in which you can amend your tax return to claim a credit or refund, or the IRS can assess additional tax. The information below reflects the periods of limitations that apply to income tax returns. Unless otherwise stated, the years refer to the period after the return was filed. Returns filed before the due date are treated as filed on the due date.

Note: Keep copies of your filed tax returns. They help in preparing future tax returns and making computations if you file an amended return.

Close

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has removed the requirement that U.S. companies and U.S. persons must report beneficial ownership information (BOI) to FinCEN under the Corporate Transparency Act.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has removed the requirement that U.S. companies and U.S. persons must report beneficial ownership information (BOI) to FinCEN under the Corporate Transparency Act. This interim final rule is consistent with the Treasury Department's recent announcement that it was suspending enforcement of the CTA against U.S. citizens, domestic reporting companies, and their beneficial owners, and that it would be narrowing the scope of the BOI reporting rule so that it applies only to foreign reporting companies.

The interim final rule amends the BOI regulations by:

changing the definition of "reporting company" to mean only those entities that are formed under the law of a foreign country and that have registered to do business in any U.S. State or Tribal jurisdiction by filing of a document with a secretary of state or similar office (these entities had formerly been called "foreign reporting companies"), and
exempting entities previously known as "domestic reporting companies" from BOI reporting requirements.

Under the revised rules, all entities created in the United States (including those previously called "domestic reporting companies") and their beneficial owners are exempt from the BOI reporting requirement, including the requirement to update or correct BOI previously reported to FinCEN. Foreign entities that meet the new definition of "reporting company" and do not qualify for a reporting exemption must report their BOI to FinCEN, but are not required to report any U.S. persons as beneficial owners. U.S. persons are not required to report BOI with respect to any such foreign entity for which they are a beneficial owner.

Reducing Regulatory Burden

On January 31, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14192, which announced an administration policy "to significantly reduce the private expenditures required to comply with Federal regulations to secure America’s economic prosperity and national security and the highest possible quality of life for each citizen" and "to alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens" on the American people.

Consistent with the executive order and with exemptive authority provided in the CTA, the Treasury Secretary (in concurrence with the Attorney General and the Homeland Security Secretary) determined that BOI reporting by domestic reporting companies and their beneficial owners "would not serve the public interest" and "would not be highly useful in national security, intelligence, and law enforcement agency efforts to detect, prevent, or prosecute money laundering, the financing of terrorism, proliferation finance, serious tax fraud, or other crimes."The preamble to the interim final rule notes that the Treasury Secretary has considered existing alternative information sources to mitigate risks. For example, under the U.S. anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism regime, covered financial institutions still have a continuing requirement to collect a legal entity customer's BOI at the time of account opening (see 31 CFR 1010.230). This will serve to mitigate certain illicit finance risks associated with exempting domestic reporting companies from BOI reporting.

BOI reporting by foreign reporting companies is still required, because such companies present heightened national security and illicit finance risks and different concerns about regulatory burdens. Further, the preamble points out that the policy direction to minimize regulatory burdens on the American people can still be achieved by exempting foreign reporting companies from having to report the BOI of any U.S. persons who are beneficial owners of such companies.

Deadlines Extended for Foreign Companies

When the interim final rule is published in the Federal Register, the following reporting deadlines apply:

Foreign entities that are registered to do business in the United States before the publication date of the interim final rule must file BOI reports no later than 30 days from that date.
Foreign entities that are registered to do business in the United States on or after the publication date of the interim final rule have 30 calendar days to file an initial BOI report after receiving notice that their registration is effective.

Effective Date; Comments Requested

The interim final rule is effective on the date of its publication in the Federal Register.

FinCEN has requested comments on the interim final rule. In light of those comments, FinCEN intends to issue a final rule later in 2025.

Written comments must be received on or before the date that is 60 days after publication of the interim final rule in the Federal Register.

Interested parties can submit comments electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. Alternatively, comments may be mailed to Policy Division, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, P.O. Box 39, Vienna, VA 22183. For both methods, refer to Docket Number FINCEN-2025-0001, OMB control number 1506-0076 and RIN 1506-AB49.

FinCEN Interim Final Rule RIN 1506-AB49

FinCEN News Release

Close

Melanie Krause, the IRS’s Chief Operating Officer, has been named acting IRS Commissioner following the retirement of Doug O’Donnell. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent acknowledged O’Donnell’s 38 years of service, commending his leadership and dedication to taxpayers.

Melanie Krause, the IRS’s Chief Operating Officer, has been named acting IRS Commissioner following the retirement of Doug O’Donnell. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent acknowledged O’Donnell’s 38 years of service, commending his leadership and dedication to taxpayers. O’Donnell, who had been acting Commissioner since January, will retire on Friday, expressing confidence in Krause’s ability to guide the agency through tax season. Krause, who joined the IRS in 2021 as Chief Data & Analytics Officer, has since played a key role in modernizing operations and overseeing core agency functions. With experience in federal oversight and operational strategy, Krause previously worked at the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General. She became Chief Operating Officer in 2024, managing finance, security, and procurement. Holding advanced degrees from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Krause will lead the IRS until a permanent Commissioner is appointed.

Close

A grant disbursement to a corporation to be used for rent payments following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center was not excluded from the corporation's gross income. Grants were made to affected businesses with funding provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The corporation's grant agreement required the corporation to employ a certain number of people in New York City, with a portion of those people employed in lower Manhattan for a period of time. Pursuant to this agreement, the corporation requested a disbursement as reimbursement for rent expenses.

Exclusions from Gross Income

Under the expansive definition of gross income, the grant proceeds were income unless specifically excluded. Payments are only excluded under Code Sec. 118(a) when a transferor intends to make a contribution to the permanent working capital of a corporation. The grant amount was not connected to capital improvements nor restricted for use in the acquisition of capital assets. The transferor intended to reimburse the corporation for rent expenses and not to make a capital contribution. As a result, the grant was intended to supplement income and defray current operating costs, and not to build up the corporation's working capital.

The grant proceeds were also not a gift under Code Sec. 102(a). The motive for providing the grant was not detached and disinterested generosity, but rather a long-term commitment from the company to create and maintain jobs. In addition, a review of the funding legislation and associated legislative history did not show that Congress possessed the requisite donative intent to consider the grant a gift. The program was intended to support the redevelopment of the area after the terrorist attacks. Finally, the grant was not excluded as a qualified disaster relief payment under Code Sec. 139(a) because that provision is only applicable to individuals.

Accuracy-Related Penalty

Because the corporation relied on Supreme Court decisions, statutory language, and regulations, there was substantial authority for its position that the grant proceeds were excluded from income. As a result, the accuracy-related penalty was not imposed.

CF Headquarters Corporation, 164 TC No. 5, Dec. 62,627

Close

The parent corporation of two tiers of controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) with a domestic partnership interposed between the two tiers was not entitled to deemed paid foreign tax credits under Code Sec. 902 or Code Sec. 960 for taxes paid or accrued by the lower-tier CFCs owned by the domestic partnership. Code Sec. 902 did not apply because there was no dividend distribution. Code Sec. 960 did not apply because the Code Sec. 951(a) inclusions with respect to the lower-tier CFCs were not taken into account by the domestic corporation.

Background

The parent corporation owned three CFCs, which were upper-tier CFC partners in a domestic partnership. The domestic partnership was the sole U.S. shareholder of several lower-tier CFCs.

The parent corporation claimed that it was entitled to deemed paid foreign tax credits on taxes paid by the lower-tier CFCs on earnings and profits, which generated Code Sec. 951 inclusions for subpart F income and Code Sec. 956 amounts. The amounts increased the earnings and profits of the upper-tier CFC partners.

Deemed Paid Foreign Tax Credits Did Not Apply

Before 2018, Code Sec. 902 allowed deemed paid foreign tax credit for domestic corporations that owned 10 percent or more of the voting stock of a foreign corporation from which it received dividends, and for taxes paid by another group member, provided certain requirements were met.

The IRS argued that no dividends were paid and so the foreign income taxes paid by the lower-tier CFCs could not be deemed paid by the entities in the higher tiers.

The taxpayer agreed that Code Sec. 902 alone would not provide a credit, but argued that through Code Sec. 960, Code Sec. 951 inclusions carried deemed dividends up through a chain of ownership. Under Code Sec. 960(a), if a domestic corporation has a Code Sec. 951(a) inclusion with respect to the earnings and profits of a member of its qualified group, Code Sec. 902 applied as if the amount were included as a dividend paid by the foreign corporation.

In this case, the domestic corporation had no Code Sec. 951 inclusions with respect to the amounts generated by the lower-tier CFCs. Rather, the domestic partnerships had the inclusions. The upper- tier CFC partners, which were foreign corporations, included their share of the inclusions in gross income. Therefore, the hopscotch provision in which a domestic corporation with a Code Sec. 951 inclusion attributable to earnings and profits of an indirectly held CFC may claim deemed paid foreign tax credits based on a hypothetical dividend from the indirectly held CFC to the domestic corporation did not apply.

Eaton Corporation and Subsidiaries, 164 TC No. 4, Dec. 62,622

Other Reference:

Code Sec. 960

Close

An appeals court affirmed that payments made by an individual taxpayer to his ex-wife did not meet the statutory criteria for deductible alimony. The taxpayer claimed said payments were deductible alimony on his federal tax returns.

The taxpayer’s payments were not deductible alimony because the governing divorce instruments contained multiple clear, explicit and express directions to that effect. The former couple’s settlement agreement stated an equitable division of marital property that was non-taxable to either party. The agreement had a separate clause obligating the taxpayer to pay a taxable sum as periodic alimony each month. The term “divorce or separation instrument” included both divorce and the written instruments incident to such decree.

Unpublished opinion affirming, per curiam, the Tax Court, Dec. 62,420(M), T.C. Memo. 2024-18.

J.A. Martino, CA-11

Close

Blog

Reducing Regulatory Burden

Deadlines Extended for Foreign Companies

Effective Date; Comments Requested

Exclusions from Gross Income

Accuracy-Related Penalty

Background

Deemed Paid Foreign Tax Credits Did Not Apply