20 Reasons Why You Should Be Working With A Tax Accountant

We value the loyal, long-standing clients that we have had the pleasure of working with for many years. Kevin Malick of Appreciated Advertising is one of those clients, and he recently shared some thoughts on his experience of working with us for nearly a decade.

“I have been working with the professionals at The Bookkeeping Company since 2007. As a small business owner, I don’t have time to do everything and I never have to worry about my payroll and finances. Knowing that the professionals at The Bookkeeping Company are taking care of everything for me gives me great peace of mind.

When my father passed away, I took over the family business and I sought an accountant and a bookkeeper. As a member of OEA (Omaha Executives Association), I knew Bob and trusted his expertise. I thought Berger & O’Toole and The Bookkeeping Company would be a good fit for my business, and they have been ever since. They now manage my personal finances as well.

The entire staff at The Bookkeeping Company is always friendly and courteous. I used to dread tax time and tax preparation, but their staff takes care of everything for me and they have taken the worry out the process for me.”

It is our pleasure to work with Kevin, and the many clients that we have been working with for many years. Give us a call today to learn more about how the experienced accountants at Berger & O’Toole and the professionals at The Bookkeeping Company can help take the worry out of your taxes and finances.

Close

Working for home can have many benefits, and while it may not be for everyone, many employees prefer a home office over a commute to a traditional office. According to Global Workplace Analytics, regular work-at-home employment among the non-self-employed population has increased 100% since 2005.

A recent study conducted by the organization, one of the foremost authorities on how, when and where people are working, found that 50% of the US workforce holds a job that is compatible with at least partial telecommute, and as much as 25% of the population works from home with regularity. The study found that 80-90% of the US workforce would like to telecommute at least part-time.

The benefits of telecommuting extend beyond convenience and lack of a commute – there can be significant tax benefits for employees. Understanding if you qualify for a home office deduction is critical, and our experienced staff can help.

Here are some considerations to keep in mind:

• You must use your home for business use on a regular basis and as your principal place of business
• You must use part of your home exclusively for conducting business
• Your business use must be for the convenience of the employer, not the employee
• You must not rent any portion of your home to your employer or receive any reimbursements for the use of your home for business

If you qualify for the home office deduction, you can deduct prorated amounts for the following:

Home mortgage interest, or rent
• Utility bills
• Home repairs
• Depreciation

If you do not qualify for the home office deduction, you may still qualify for some business-related expenses. These expenses can fall into one of two categories:

• Business Expenses: business costs that are ordinary, necessary and reasonable, such as office supplies, postage, telephone line. You may also be allowed to depreciate the cost of computers, office furniture and possibly even the cost of the office itself
• Homeowners’ Deductions: expenses that are related to your home, such as home mortgage interest and real estate taxes, are allowed as itemized deductions regardless of your home office status

Taking advantage of available benefits is always advised, but the home office deduction is highly scrutinized by the IRS so understanding the rules and keeping meticulous records are essential. The experts with the Bookkeeping Company can help you manage your records on a regular basis in order to maximize eligible deductions. For example, if you conduct client meetings in your home you may qualify but the home office deduction, but meticulous records of dates and times of meetings, as well as understanding the minimum requirements, are important. Our bookkeepers can assist with the proper documentation.

As technological advances continue to improve, more companies are opting for a virtual environment. In many industries, employees can work from anywhere, and the need for a traditional brick and mortar building becomes less important. If you work virtually, or would like to consider it, let the experts in our office help you maximize the arrangement!

Close

One thing we hear all the time from small business owners is that they never expected all the paperwork! Budgets, payroll, tax forms – it can all be very overwhelming! The Bookkeeping Company can help you wade through all the paperwork, and determine if you need the help of a bookkeeper or if an accountant is what you need.

We help individuals and small business owners everyday who become overwhelmed with the papers and forms and deadlines. It’s not unusual for us to meet a client who thinks they need the help of an accountant, when in fact a bookkeeper is a better fit. So how do you know if you need a bookkeeper or an accountant? We can help!

If you struggle to keep up with invoices or the budget never seems to balance, a bookkeeper can help keep you on track and alleviate the worry. Here is a look at some of the areas a bookkeeper can help manage:

Bank and Budget reconciliation
Accounts payable and receivable
Payroll services, including year-end tax reporting
Quickbook Pro Advisor
Financial Statements
Sales and Use Tax Services

Our experienced staff can help with many other tasks, including notary public, contractor registration and new hire reporting. A full list of services offered by our qualified staff can be found here.

If you are comfortable with budgets and payroll, or have those covered by a qualified staff member, but you struggle with taxes, an accountant can assist you. Here’s a look at where an accountant can help:

Full accounting services
Audits, reviews and compilations
Financial forecasts and projections
Complete tax services
Tax planning and preparation

Give us a call, we are happy to help you determine if you need the help of a bookkeeper or an accountant – or both!

Close

According to Webster’s Dictionary, an entrepreneur is a person who starts a business and is willing to risk loss in order to make money. It is exciting to turn your dream and hard work into reality in the form of a successful business; but failing to take the proper steps to ensure your business is financially healthy can be disastrous.

When establishing your business, it is vital that you meet with an attorney to ensure your business is properly filed with state and federal entities and that your business is established with the proper state and federal IDs. Most business owners, who are experts in their own fields, are not experts in the rapidly- changing rules and regulations, so trusting those who are is crucial.

Business owners quickly learn the importance of proper record keeping. Missed deadlines or inaccurate tax or payroll filings can lead to penalties that are potentially insurmountable. Enlisting the help of The Bookkeeping Co. can give you the peace of mind that your company’s financial needs are being constantly monitored and maintained.

The Bookkeeping Co. will ensure your taxes are filed properly and on schedule, thereby avoiding any penalties for late or missed deadlines. We will not only help you balance and maintain your company’s budget, but we will help you understand the current and predicted future of your company’s financial situation. We will advise you accordingly, and ensure you understand the value and worth of your business.

Make an appointment with The Bookkeeping Co. today to learn more about how we can alleviate the worries associated with running a financially sound business, so you can focus on doing what you do best- running your business!

Close

It’s tax season, the time of year when we are reminded of how much paper we collect and save. Many financial institutions are moving towards electronic records, which is a good solution to help cut down on the growing piles of paper. But it’s important to save and file some of documents.

The IRS recommends maintaining tax returns and any supporting documents (W-2’s, income, deduction or credit documents, etc.) for at least seven years. This is the period of time you have to claim a refund that you are entitled to, or for the IRS to assess an additional tax if your reporting wasn’t accurate. Additional recommendations and details can be found on the IRS website.

The length of time you should hold on to other documents differs depending on the documents. Records of home improvement costs should be kept for as long as you own the home. Stock purchase documents showing the purchase price and date should be saved until you sell the investment. This can be extremely helpful if you decide to switch to a new stock broker.

Everyday documents such as credit card statements, utility bills, banks statements and paycheck stubs can be destroyed after a year. Hold on to quarterly investment statements until you receive the annual statement. Medical bills, cancelled insurance policies and records of real estate sales should be filed for three years. Records of satisfied loans should be kept for at least seven years.

When you do dispose of records that are no longer necessary, they should be shredded to protect your sensitive information. Many organizations also offer free document shredding events to assist with safe disposal of records.

There are some documents that should be kept forever – marriage licenses, birth certificates, wills, adoption papers, death certificates and records of paid mortgages. We recommend storing these records in a safe lock box or safety deposit box.

The paper collection can be overwhelming. The Bookkeeping Co. can help you manage that growing pile by answering your questions about what needs to be kept and what can be tossed. Give us a call today and we will help you simplify your record keeping.

Generally, you must keep your records that support an item of income, deduction or credit shown on your tax return until the period of limitations for that tax return runs out.

The period of limitations is the period of time in which you can amend your tax return to claim a credit or refund, or the IRS can assess additional tax. The information below reflects the periods of limitations that apply to income tax returns. Unless otherwise stated, the years refer to the period after the return was filed. Returns filed before the due date are treated as filed on the due date.

Note: Keep copies of your filed tax returns. They help in preparing future tax returns and making computations if you file an amended return.

Close

The American Institute of CPAs in a March 31 letter to House of Representatives voiced its “strong support” for a series of tax administration bills passed in recent days.

The four bills highlighted in the letter include the Electronic Filing and Payment Fairness Act (H.R. 1152), the Internal Revenue Service Math and Taxpayer Help Act (H.R. 998), the Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act (H.R. 517), and the Disaster Related Extension of Deadlines Act (H.R. 1491).

All four bills passed unanimously.

H.R. 1152 would apply the “mailbox” rule to electronically submitted tax returns and payments. Currently, a paper return or payment is counted as “received” based on the postmark of the envelope, but its electronic equivalent is counted as “received” when the electronic submission arrived or is reviewed. This bill would change all payment and tax form submissions to follow the mailbox rule, regardless of mode of delivery.

“The AICPA has previously recommended this change and thinks it would offer clarity and simplification to the payment and document submission process,” the organization said in the letter.

H.R. 998 “would require notices describing a mathematical or clerical error be made in plain language, and require the Treasury Secretary to provide additional procedures for requesting an abatement of a math or clerical adjustment, including by telephone or in person, among other provisions,” the letter states.

H.R. 517 would allow the IRS to grant federal tax relief once a state governor declares a state of emergency following a natural disaster, which is quicker than waiting for the federal government to declare a state of emergency as directed under current law, which could take weeks after the state disaster declaration. This bill “would also expand the mandatory federal filing extension under section 7508(d) from 60 days to 120 days, providing taxpayers with additional time to file tax returns following a disaster,” the letter notes, adding that increasing the period “would provide taxpayers and tax practitioners much needed relief, even before a disaster strikes.”

H.R. 1491 would extend deadlines for disaster victims to file for a tax refund or tax credit. The legislative solution “granting an automatic extension to the refund or credit lookback period would place taxpayers affected my major disasters on equal footing as taxpayers not impacted by major disasters and would afford greater clarity and certainty to taxpayers and tax practitioners regarding this lookback period,” AICPA said.

Also passed by the House was the National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act (H.R. 997) which, according to a summary of the bill on Congress.gov, “authorizes the National Taxpayer Advocate to appoint legal counsel within the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) to report directly to the National Taxpayer Advocate. The bill also expands the authority of the National Taxpayer Advocate to take personnel actions with respect to local taxpayer advocates (located in each state) to include actions with respect to any employee of TAS.”

Finally, the House passed H.R. 1155, the Recovery of Stolen Checks Act, which would require the Treasury to establish procedures that would allow a taxpayer to elect to receive replacement funds electronically from a physical check that was lost or stolen.

All bills passed unanimously. The passed legislation mirrors some of the provisions included in a discussion draft legislation issued by the Senate Finance Committee in January 2025. A section-by-section summary of the Senate discussion draft legislation can be found here.

AICPA’s tax policy and advocacy comment letters for 2025 can be found here.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

Close

The Tax Court ruled that the value claimed on a taxpayer’s return exceeded the value of a conversation easement by 7,694 percent. The taxpayer was a limited liability company, classified as a TEFRA partnership. The Tax Court used the comparable sales method, as backstopped by the price actually paid to acquire the property.

The taxpayer was entitled to a charitable contribution deduction based on its fair market value. The easement was granted upon rural land in Alabama. The property was zoned A–1 Agricultural, which permitted agricultural and light residential use only. The property transaction at occurred at arm’s length between a willing seller and a willing buyer.

Rezoning

The taxpayer failed to establish that the highest and best use of the property before the granting of the easement was limestone mining. The taxpayer failed to prove that rezoning to permit mining use was reasonably probable.

Land Value

The taxpayer’s experts erroneously equated the value of raw land with the net present value of a hypothetical limestone business conducted on the land. It would not be profitable to pay the entire projected value of the business.

Penalty Imposed

The claimed value of the easement exceeded the correct value by 7,694 percent. Therefore, the taxpayer was liable for a 40 percent penalty for a gross valuation misstatement under Code Sec. 6662(h).

Ranch Springs, LLC, 164 TC No. 6, Dec. 62,636

Close

State and local housing credit agencies that allocate low-income housing tax credits and states and other issuers of tax-exempt private activity bonds have been provided with a listing of the proper population figures to be used when calculating the 2025:

calendar-year population-based component of the state housing credit ceiling under Code Sec. 42(h)(3)(C)(ii);
calendar-year private activity bond volume cap under Code Sec. 146; and
exempt facility bond volume limit under Code Sec. 142(k)(5)

These figures are derived from the estimates of the resident populations of the 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, which were released by the Bureau of the Census on December 19, 2024. The figures for the insular areas of American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands are the midyear population figures in the U.S. Census Bureau’s International Database.

Notice 2025-18

Close

The value of assets of a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) trust includible in a decedent's gross estate was not reduced by the amount of a settlement intended to compensate the decedent for undistributed income.

The trust property consisted of an interest in a family limited partnership (FLP), which held title to ten rental properties, and cash and marketable securities. To resolve a claim by the decedent's estate that the trustees failed to pay the decedent the full amount of income generated by the FLP, the trust and the decedent's children's trusts agreed to be jointly and severally liable for a settlement payment to her estate. The Tax Court found an estate tax deficiency, rejecting the estate's claim that the trust assets should be reduced by the settlement amount and alternatively, that the settlement claim was deductible from the gross estate as an administration expense (P. Kalikow Est., Dec. 62,167(M), TC Memo. 2023-21).

Trust Not Property of the Estate

The estate presented no support for the argument that the liability affected the fair market value of the trust assets on the decedent's date of death. The trust, according to the court, was a legal entity that was not itself an asset of the estate. Thus, a liability that belonged to the trust but had no impact on the value of the underlying assets did not change the value of the gross estate. Furthermore, the settlement did not burden the trust assets. A hypothetical purchaser of the FLP interest, the largest asset of the trust, would not assume the liability and, therefore, would not regard the liability as affecting the price. When the parties stipulated the value of the FLP interest, the estate was aware of the undistributed income claim. Consequently, the value of the assets included in the gross estate was not diminished by the amount of the undistributed income claim.

Claim Not an Estate Expense

The claim was owed to the estate by the trust to correct the trustees' failure to distribute income from the rental properties during the decedent's lifetime. As such, the claim was property included in the gross estate, not an expense of the estate. The court explained that even though the liability was owed by an entity that held assets included within the taxable estate, the claim itself was not an estate expense. The court did not address the estate's theoretical argument that the estate would be taxed twice on the underlying assets held in the trust and the amount of the settlement because the settlement was part of the decedent's residuary estate, which was distributed to a charity. As a result, the claim was not a deductible administration expense of the estate.

P.B. Kalikow, Est., CA-2

Close

An individual was not entitled to deduct flowthrough loss from the forfeiture of his S Corporation’s portion of funds seized by the U.S. Marshals Service for public policy reasons. The taxpayer pleaded guilty to charges of bribery, fraud and money laundering. Subsequently, the U.S. Marshals Service seized money from several bank accounts held in the taxpayer’s name or his wholly owned corporation.

An individual was not entitled to deduct flowthrough loss from the forfeiture of his S Corporation’s portion of funds seized by the U.S. Marshals Service for public policy reasons. The taxpayer pleaded guilty to charges of bribery, fraud and money laundering. Subsequently, the U.S. Marshals Service seized money from several bank accounts held in the taxpayer’s name or his wholly owned corporation. The S corporation claimed a loss deduction related to its portion of the asset seizures on its return and the taxpayer reported a corresponding passthrough loss on his return.

However, Courts have uniformly held that loss deductions for forfeitures in connection with a criminal conviction frustrate public policy by reducing the "sting" of the penalty. The taxpayer maintained that the public policy doctrine did not apply here, primarily because the S corporation was never indicted or charged with wrongdoing. However, even if the S corporation was entitled to claim a deduction for the asset seizures, the public policy doctrine barred the taxpayer from reporting his passthrough share. The public policy doctrine was not so rigid or formulaic that it may apply only when the convicted person himself hands over a fine or penalty.

Hampton, TC Memo. 2025-32, Dec. 62,642(M)

Close

Blog

Rezoning

Land Value

Penalty Imposed

Trust Not Property of the Estate

Claim Not an Estate Expense